To do so, they apply to the court for Norwich orders, which compel ISPs to disclose the name and address associated with an IP address. Canadian courts have ordered ISPs to hand over this information in a series of decisions since Most internet accounts have changing IP addresses, so finding a particular user is not necessarily a simple process.
Rogers has appealed that decision to the Supreme Court of Canada. Meantime, movie rights holders have started identifying the Does and taking them to court. Rogers alone has seen the number of Norwich orders related to alleged copyright infringement rise to in from 13 in and zero in , according to court documents.
Tamir Israel, a lawyer at the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, said the structure of these lawsuits encourages people accused of copyright infringement to simply pay up. CIPPIC, which intervened in some of the Voltage cases, has noticed smaller movie studios around the world using lawsuits — or the threat of them — as a way to make more money from their films rather than actually deter people from pirating content. It seems geared more towards an ongoing compensation mechanism and less towards this deterrence.
The court acknowledged that the ease of sharing movies online has a negative effect on the paid content market, but it refused to allow Voltage to lump all the Does together. Indeed, defendants named in these lawsuits can expect to take on the cost of slogging through federal court, whether they hire a lawyer to fight the charges or settle. Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the Financial Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Financial Post Top Stories will soon be in your inbox. We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again. This website uses cookies to personalize your content including ads , and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here.
Apparently, according to the CBC , Canadians now run the risk of actually being fined for torrenting or otherwise illegally downloading copyrighted content like TV shows and movies. The CBC spoke with a Nova Scotia lawyer who explained that Canadians who receive a piece of registered mail from a movie studio should take it seriously, as ignoring it could result in further legal action.
A torrent of lawsuits are descending on Canadians accused of online file sharing. Fraser David T. Fraser If continuously ignore, that could turn into a "lien on your house" or a "garnishment of your salary. Canada's Copyright Modernization Act allows internet service providers to keep track of the IP addresses of users who have been flagged as "illegally downloading" copyrighted content.
Then, they will send you a letter informing you that you are being sued, and giving you a month to put together a defence—or pay up. If you got one of the aforementioned letters, it is real, and you should contact a lawyer to review your options ASAP. Fraser warned that you should take this situation seriously. Fraser also said that his firm has already been contacted by people who were on the receiving end of these letters, which you can see in his Tweet below:.
A torrent of lawsuits are descending on Canadians accused of online file sharing. If you get one of these, it can't be ignored. You're actually being sued for copyright infringement. Previous tweet had a broken link pic. Fraser privacylawyer April 15, That said, there are a few things that will affect your liability.
0コメント